Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 David Timms <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #5 from David Timms <[email protected]> 2008-12-27 21:26:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > why you don't fire your efforts in direction of open source programs, like > KVM, > xen or QEMU ? USing Fedora gives users like me the advantages of Fedora and the capability to contribute to the Fedora Project, but virtualization gives me what they may require for the machine to be a useful (winxp) in the real employment world. > vmware is not opensource Correct. > and your contribution can't be accepted. I believe this to be incorrect. Please point to the section of the guidelines that would exclude this meta package. > please take a look. I have. Did you notice that this request for review is a meta-package only. It does not require any non-open source packages, nor any packages outside of the Fedora world. At all. I understand that there will be many who don't support the out of Fedora applications, that this this will make easier to use, but I am yet to see anything that would stop this package actually being acceptable to Fedora, and am hence re-opening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
