Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> 2008-12-28 22:54:25 EDT --- OK, a few other areas that NEEDSWORK: 3. static libs are preferably omitted. But if included at all (with justification), must be packaged separately, into something like %{name}-devel-static. .la files should go with the statics libs (omitted, or packaged along with the static libs) 4. %_includedir/ltdl.h conflicts with system libtool-ltdl-devel. Omit from packaging 5. replace %{_includedir}/mgl/*.h with (something like) %{_includedir}/mgl/ so parent dir is owned too. 6. Why does -devel have a separate (and invalid) License: GPL ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
