Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Misnamed package, add Provides?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165885





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-08-18 14:05 EST -------
Sure, it wasn't entirely unexpected, otherwise I would have noticed it in my  
review :) 
  
But I still think using the CPAN distribution name is the right thing to do, 
at least wrt the guidelines.  Why settle for "usually they have a main 
module", and spend time pondering what might The Module be (checking 
VERSION_FROM is not necessarily a very good criteria for that), when all of 
them have an unambiguous distribution name as long as the unit of packaging is 
the very distribution? 
 
Anyway, as said, IMO it's Ralf's call whether he wants to do something about 
this package, and my .02€ is listed in the summary and initial comment of this 
bug... 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

--
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list

Reply via email to