On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 19:49 -0400, Mairin Duffy wrote: > Juan Camilo Prada Ojeda wrote: > > Im open to any feedback you can provide > > > > [1] - http://jprada.fedorapeople.org/out/en/get-fedora > > [2] - http://publictest15.fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora > > This doesn' t look like: > > http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/get-fedora/
There may have been some confusion from the last meeting on IRC? I saw
some ambivalence.
My best recollection from discussions here is that Mairin's design had
the consensus, mainly because it was focused on doing less with less.
It pushes aside everything but "get this one thing now."
The wizard/choice tree approach seems to work best with a divided
audience with variations on need. Our highest goal for get-fedora is
different, though: two uses cases ("I don't know what I need","I know
just what I need"); we're serving the don't-know people on the one page;
and pushing all the content for do-know people to specialty pages.
If we had a Fedora Live for 64-bit and PPC, does the Apache session
capture the architecture of the client? That might be an interesting
one, to offer an arch-specific download.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-websites-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
