Ah if only I could have found the Steve jobs emails to reply to, would have saved all this bother!
Don't worry James the naughty kids are sitting in the corner... And thanks rip or irp for your reasonable sense! And sorry everyone else for the spam!! > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:04:05 -0400 > Subject: Re: The economist cover oct 8-14 > To: [email protected] > > Yeah, we can promote that to an irp. > > And I admit to putting up with drive-by posting, which are generally > what I am doing when I post using irp, so would have let the Jamila > post pass. Had XDude not responded with the image, it probably would > have flown under the radar and been done with. So yeah, Simon is > right: XDude is the culprit here. > > It remains to be seen if this will spawn another long-winded > discussion though. Given that the complaints have outnumbered the > content... > > Let it drop, folks, > > :) > > irp > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 20:55, James Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wouldn't that be "irp" for the marginal? If not, may I suggest that > > suddenly this makes Houdini and Penn & Teller viable conversations? Sorry, > > rip. I'll rebut with the basic standard retort. I am not here to talk > > about other interests. Ray had his say on Apple and the thread died. > > Starting it anew isn't appropriate. Frankly I'm sick to death of the Steve > > Jobs topic. > > > > -James > >
