It is completely a myth now. 25 years ago, not so much. Back then you had Amiga and other systems which did graphics and such as well.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:09 PM, BW~Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > I have never understood this argument that MACs are better for multimedia > and everyone I have asked have said "I don't know they are just better". > They use the same processors now (Intel) and the same graphics cards (nvidia > or AMD) and the same software (Corel or Adobe) which have been used in > Windows machines for years. For the same price point a Windows machine will > be much better equipped and yet this myth as I believe it to be of MACs > being better for multimedia work keeps persisting. Does anyone know of a > solid case where a MAC is better? > > "and the art departments got early Macs." >> >> Best, R.E.F. >> ---- >> www.crydee.com >> -- Nick A "You know what I wish? I wish that all the scum of the world had but a single throat, and I had my hands about it..." Rorschach, 1975 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." Bill Vaughan "The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato
