> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Anestis Kozakis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 20 March 2012 05:51, William <[email protected]> wrote: >> > **************Spoiler*************** >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm an avid reader with a long memory. I went back to double check and >> > confirmed something from A Darkness at Sethanon, Macros helps Tomas >> > remember >> > his Valheru heritage and it notes that "Like all Valheru Ashen-Shugar's >> > first meal was raw meat". In A Crown Imperiled it is written that >> > Draken-Koren's first meal was nursing from the tigress. Is this >> > intentional? >> >> Milk straight from the teat is different to the processed and >> pasteurised stuff that you buy at the supermarket, so it can be raw in >> a way. I don't see a problem with this. >> >> Anestis.
On 20 March 2012 07:06, tony gurnick <[email protected]> wrote: > not to be picky but you dont see the difference between milk and meat? Placing your comment at the bottom of the thread as regards to possible spoilers..... Yes, there is a difference between meat and milk, and I acknowledge that, but there is also a difference between milk that has been collected and processed and milk straight form the teat of an animal. You could say the latter is raw milk, whilst the former is not. I know my grandparents back in their village in Greece, when they rook milk form the cow, they then boiled it before allowing it to be drunk by anyone. That is a form of processing. Again, I don't see an issue in what Ray has described. In this case, raw is straight from the animal instead of being cooked or processed in any way. Yes, I acknowledge that in medieval times most cultures would collect the milk then drink it. So yes, that is also raw milk. Still doesn't make it an issue in what ray has described. Anestis. -- Anestis Kozakis | [email protected] | http://www.akozakis.id.au/
