-----Original Message----- From: Earl Borah
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 6:56 AM
To: feistfans-l
Subject: Re: Alternate Reading Order


NO SPOILERS - ANY SPOILERS STRIPPED OUT OF THIS REPLY

The chronological order is VERY jumpy and I'd find it distracting. And as somebody noted once, since a couple books share timelines, true chronological order involves jumping back and forth between books. Too much work, and too disjointed to the storytelling of each individual book, IMO.

I find also that some books set before books that have already been written, sometimes have small references you won't pick up on unless you've read the later books.

Allan


Reply via email to