Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2006-01-05 05:39:57 AM: > But in this example the "db2e" is not under version control, so multiple > concurrently active versions of the "db2ejdbc" bundle are required to > agree on a common db2e library. > > Even if you put the db2e code into it's own bundle, you couldn't > differentiate between the two versions when making a C call from db2jdbc > to db2e (because you can't get a handle to the library version you want) > unless you rely upon the loadLibrary() call to open the library for you. > > I think the moral to this story is that the bundle versioning bottoms > out at the loadLibrary() call, beyond that you should probably revert to > deploying the platform libraries outside the framework, and using the > platform's version control where it exists.
Probably wise. :-) > > Regards, > Tim > > > -- > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > IBM Java technology centre, UK.
