Rob Walker wrote: > I'm interested in views on updating our http to a newer Jetty version > > - a 5.x release will probably be a fairly painless move, since the > architecture hasn't changed much > - a 6.x will probably take more effort, but also mean we catch the "next > wave" of Jetty optimisations early > > Anyone got any views/preferences - not sure I'll get time to do both, > and although it's riskier since 6.0 is still in alpha it also seems to > have more long term mileage in it. Anyone wanting a "stable" http can > still use the current 4.x if they're not ready for the change.
AFAIU, 5.x uses commons logging, which has caused problems with at least two applications I've tried to upgrade from 4->5. 6 has removed it, and worked fine. Personally, I'd go with 6.0. Upayavira
