Trustin Lee wrote:
On 6/1/06, Timothy Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/1/06, Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Will hopefully get a chance to move mangen into Felix quite soon.
>
> The proposed package name that most seemed happy with at last count
was:
>
> org.apache.felix.mangen
>
> I could also live with any of the following if people think they're
> better:
>
> org.apache.felix.tools.mangen
> org.apache.felix.utils.mangen
> org.apache.felix.support.mangen
Is there no overwhelming desire by the community to distinguish between
support tools code and actual Felix source via package naming
conventions?
I prefer org.apache.felix.tool.mangen. (I usually don't use plural for a
package name component.) Of course we can go with
org.apache.felix.mangen for a while and move to
tool.mangen when we get more tools.
+1 on both accounts (start with felix.mangen for now and no plurals in
the future)
-> richard
