On Tuesday 06 June 2006 23:08, Rob Walker wrote: > In my mind, the model I envisaged that could be workable was: > > * a "logger" bundle that whilst supporting the standard OSGi > LogService API for the very basic case, also offered a fairly rich > LOG4J (maybe SLF4J now) set of API functionality
Ok, tell me what is missing in Pax Logging and I'll add it; http://wiki.ops4j.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=pax:logging Essentially; - Log4J drives the backend. - Each bundle, class uses whatever Logging API it wishes. Cheers Niclas
