[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-75?page=comments#action_12415147 ] 

Richard S. Hall commented on FELIX-75:
--------------------------------------

My original approach was to do as you suggest, i.e., use an empty activator. 
However, it appears in the maven plugin that I cannot tell the difference 
between an empty <bundleActivator> tag and a non-existent <bundleActivator> 
tag...they both simply return NULL.

Further, I guess since it is causing so many problems for people, the better 
default is to have them explicitly say they want auto-detection rather than 
making it the default.

> Improve bundle activator detection in Maven OSGi plugin
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: FELIX-75
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-75
>      Project: Felix
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: Maven OSGi Plugin
>     Reporter: Richard S. Hall
>     Priority: Blocker

>
> Currently, the Maven OSGi plugin detects the bundle activator by simply 
> checking the byte code constant pool for any class that references 
> org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator. This check is too simplistic for cases 
> where subclasses of BundleActivator are used or in cases where the activator 
> is imported from another bundle. The first case could be improved by better 
> byte code analysis, I am not sure about the latter.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to