On 6/6/06, Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote: > Trustin Lee wrote: >> In Apache MINA, I decided to name the JAR files like this: >> >> mina-<subproject name>-<sub-sub-project name>-...jar. >> >> For example, there are JARs whose names are: >> >> * mina-core >> * mina-filter-compression >> * mina-filter-ssl >> * mina-integration-spring >> * mina-integration-jmx (this doesn't exist yet. It's just for example.) >> >> I understand Jeff's concern and it really becomes a problem as the >> number of >> subprojects increase. But I think we can manage this at least within >> Felix. For other projects outside of Felix which depends on Felix, they >> will have a different Maven groupId, so I think it's fine. > > So, does this mean that we are going to use this approach in Felix? Is > this something that is ready to vote on now? > As simple as it is - I'm happy that such a naming convention would be both clear and easy to use, and not have too many pitfalls for the future. So I'd be happy to see this go to a vote.
+1 Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
