Felix Meschberger wrote:
On 6/20/06, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In general, any solution for doing stuff like you have suggested, I
would hope, should concentrate on using/improving these existing
mechanisms rather than creating new ones.
I definitely agree. Yet not being able to ammend BundleCache and
BundleArchive, I am still required to have file system space - this
sort of worries me.
This is the sort of stuff that we can improve upon then. I am not
against making it once again possible to be able configure which
implementation of BundleCache to use. It was just removed because I had
no valid use case. We just need to discuss what is needed and how to do it.
-> richard
