Karl Pauls wrote: > >> To avoid the super right issue the bridge won't be able to set up an >> event publisher on demand(only when an even handler will be avaiable on >> the Framework) and that will end up to a degradation of the OSGi host >> and also of the REAL UPnP Network(I mean the set of device connected on >> network that are shown as imported on the OSGi network) > > I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Do you mean that we need > to weigh-up whether we require an additional permission for the bridge > v.s. causing UPnP network load? I do think the additional permission > is acceptable in this case. Exactly :-)
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Francesco Furfari
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Karl Pauls
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Francesco Furfari
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Karl Pauls
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Francesco Furfari
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Francesco Furfari
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Marcel Offermans
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Dennis Geurts
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Francesco Furfari
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Even... Marcel Offermans
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Event Admin service Stefano Lenzi
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Event Admin service Richard S. Hall
- Re: Again on the UPnP and Event Admin service Stefano Lenzi

