Okay, thanks. Jan.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Humberto Cervantes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: KXML License > > Hello everybody, > > Well, it should be pretty easy to introduce kxml2 into the > ServiceBinder by looking how this is done in the DS > implementation. Jan, if you have any questions, you can > e-mail me. I'm sorry I can't do this myself at this moment... > > Humberto > > > > Jan S. Rellermeyer wrote: > > I have used both versions of kXML in past projects. If you > agree, I will try to port it to the new version over the weekend. > > > > Jan. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > ETH Zurich, MSc Jan S. Rellermeyer, > > Information and Communication Systems Research Group (IKS), > Department > > of Computer Science, IFW B 47.1, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH8092 > Zürich Tel > > +41 44 632 30 38, http://www.iks.inf.ethz.ch > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:52 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: KXML License > >> > >> I agree that we have two options: > >> > >> 1. Nuking SB from the repo. > >> 2. Porting SB to kxml2. > >> > >> Since our SCR impl uses kxml2 and is simply a modified > version of SB, > >> it seems like it would be simple to modify SB to use > kxml2...the main > >> issue is finding someone who has the time to do it. I know > Humberto > >> is very busy at this point in time... > >> > >> -> richard > >> > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------ > Humberto Cervantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Web: http://www.humbertocervantes.net > > Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, San Rafael > Atlixco Nº 186, Col. Vicentina, C.P. 09340 Delegación > Iztapalapa. Distrito Federal, Mexico > > Tel: (52) 55 5804 4634 ext 211 > ------------------------------------------------------ > > >
