This is good news. Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
BJ Hargrave wrote:
Yes. In fact OSGi has a draft license for this purpose under review. The
goal is to approve the license by mid September and then the OSGi TCK can
be licensed to ASF (and other similar orgs).
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
"Alan D. Cabrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/11/2006 07:37 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]
To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Re: OSGi R4 specification compliance (part 2)
Richard, I think that I asked this before and maybe there was a reply.
Is it possible to get the ASF a license to run the tests in a similar
manner that Sun let's our projects have access to its TCKs?
Regards,
Alan
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Arnaud Quiblier wrote:
I read in a thread named "OSGI R4 specification compliance" that Felix
passed the OSGi's TCK.
This is really interesting news.
Felix does NOT pass the TCK...if it did, there wouldn't be any need to
volunteer. :-)
Felix is close to passing the TCK for mandatory spec features.
Yes, I'm a volunteer ...
Can you give us issues you consider as High Priority ?
The TCK results page lists all of the issues that need to be worked on:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FELIX/Felix+OSGi+TCK+Results
I am currently in the process of working on require-bundle
(FELIX-28)...I imagine after that I will look into fragments
(FELIX-29). I don't have any time table for either of these, but
hopefully require-bundle will not be that far off.
Any of the other issues are fine to consider for implementation.
Must issues tagged "0.8.0" in Felix's JIRA be considered as urgent ?
Issues tagged for "0.8.0" are important if/when we get ready to make a
public release of Felix, but they are generally not related to passing
the TCK.
I would say that the most self-contained issues would be: FELIX-23,
FELIX-26, FELIX-27, and FELIX-32. Perhaps FELIX-31, FELIX-100, and
FELIX-102 wouldn't be too bad either.
Just pick one and look into it...I can answer any questions that you
have and will be more than happy to discuss any potential approaches
if needed.
Good luck.
-> richard
