I think this is part of the standard template that the Incubator documentation 
says that podlings should follow.

I was thinking it might be difficult to get everyone to agree on a single 
standard too. I certainly don't think it is a requirement, although at a  
minimum each subproject should document the style that they use. In general, I 
try to use the style of the file that I am editing if the file is not my own.

But who knows, maybe we can all agree on one. :-)

-> richard

Upayavira wrote:
>Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> Since one of the things we should have for Felix is a coding standard, I
>> just added a lengthy page on the wiki with a PROPOSAL for such a coding
>> standard. In fact, I simply took our company's guide (with their
>> permission of course) and made some minor alterations (some things were
>> not relevant here). This is meant as a starting point, so please read it
>> and give your feedback.
>> 
>> You can read it here on the site (the static copy) and you will notice
>> that we need to improve our stylesheet to get better formatting:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/codingstandards.html
>> 
>> that being said, you can also have a look on the wiki directly (which
>> has better built-in styles already):
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FELIX/codingstandards
>> 
>> Feel free to comment on anything that's there or missing, voice your
>> opinion on what we should and should not try to "standardize". I'm
>> particularly interested in your opinions on all the different modules
>> (subprojects) and if we should even attempt to enforce any specific
>> guide on all of them.
>> 
>> In my experience, agreeing on a coding standard has always been a
>> difficult process, because many people have strong personal opinions and
>> often, valid points can be made for deciding some things either way. The
>> reason to even try to get a standard is easier read- and
>> understandability. Oh well, enough talk for one evening!
>
>Coding standards in open source projects are an interesting phenomenon,
>in as much as there is really no way to enforce them. Really, all I
>think we could have would be a recommendation. Is that how you were
>offering it?
>
>Upayavira

Reply via email to