On Thursday 07 September 2006 22:14, Rob Walker wrote: > Not sure I agree with that view personally: > > CPL is definitely a license which includes source use - it's our base > license for open source work.
It is related to the restrictions placed on downstream users. IIRC (too lazy to check) CPL had some "contribute back" or "notification" requirements that are not ASL compatible. Cliff's list has been discussed plenty over at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers Niclas
