Hmmm. I think you mean to say that the <include-maven> instruction
would make you happy because then you have a choice?

So we only have to decide if the JAR is copied or inlined?

Kind regards,

     Peter Kriens



JEC> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:49 +0100, Peter Kriens wrote:
>> I am not a maven expert so maybe there are better ways to do it.
>> 
>> I never understood "provided" to mean include? If that is the
>> definition I can automatically include them. Can someone point me to
>> the relevant literature?
JEC> Provided means that the jar is provided or available (somehow - like
JEC> another bundle in the felix framework) at runtime. 

JEC> Although the maven doc says:
JEC> "provided - this is much like compile, but indicates you expect the JDK
JEC> or a container to provide it. It is only available on the compilation
JEC> classpath, and is not transitive." 

JEC> <tangent not-the-main-point-I-want-to-make="but just thought of it">
JEC> Now this can't be right, if you think about it anything scoped as
JEC> provided would have to be available on maven's compilation, AND test AND
JEC> run classpaths as well. (How else could you test your project?)
JEC> </tangent>

JEC> The Problem I really wanted to point out ---->
JEC> When using the old OSGi plugin it was necessary to ALWAYS specify the
JEC> scope 'provided' for any dependency, (let's call it depx that were/are
JEC> bundles themselves and would be 'provided' at runtime) to prevent them
JEC> from being embedded into the bundle (bundleA) along with their 'compile'
JEC> scoped siblings. 

JEC> Unfortunately there is a side effect to using the scope element to
JEC> determine the embedding of jars into the bundle.

JEC> With provided, Maven no longer tags the artifact (depx) as transitive to
JEC> bundleA, and thus other maven projects that now use the newly
JEC> built/artifact bundleA as a dependency have lost transitive 'sight' of
JEC> that depx. Oops!

JEC> So is it possible to allow compile and provided scoped dependencies to
JEC> be included or not included in the bundle? If so we can offer the
JEC> community an OSGi bundling plugin without sacrificing maven's transitive
JEC> dependency functionality.


JEC> cheers,
JEC> John


-- 
Peter Kriens                              Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry                    AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France                    ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens                             Fax +1 8153772599

Reply via email to