iPOJO should automatically propagate configuration properties as service 
properties, per CM spec.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: FELIX-222
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-222
             Project: Felix
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: iPOJO
         Environment: Not relevant.
            Reporter: Steven E. Harris


The Configuration Admin Service Specification advises in Section 104.4.3, 
Property Propagation, that:

  An implementation of a Managed Service should copy all the properties of the 
Dictionary object
  argument in updated(Dictionary), known or unknown, into its service 
registration properties
  using ServiceRegistration.setProperties.

It looks like iPOJO does some of this propagation for a ManagedService in 
ConfigurationHandler.updated() around line 256, apparently only propagating the 
properties not known as "configurable properties". However, I think this 
reading of the specification may be too literal, in that iPOJO does not do the 
same propagation of the initial properties provided to a ManagedServiceFactory.

ComponentManager implements ManagedServiceFactory. In its updated(String, 
Dictionary) method, it calls on createComponentInstance(), which then calls on 
InstanceManager.configure(), which lets each Handler take its turn configuring 
the new instance. Of particular interest here is 
ProvidedServiceHandler.configure(). It only exposes properties defined in 
<property> elements inside the <provides> element of a component metadata 
specification. Any properties provided in the initial configuration not defined 
beforehand in the metadata are ignored and not published as service properties.

The CM specification does note:

  A configuration target service may ignore any configuration properties it
  does not recognize, or it may change the values of the configuration 
properties
  before these properties are registered. Configuration properties in the
  Framework service registry are not strictly related to the configuration
  information.

The seems to contradict the advise in the first paragraph, perhaps just 
clarifying that compliance is not mandatory. What would be useful is some 
directive on the <provides> element that would allow all unknown configuration 
properties to be propagated as service properties. At present, this propagation 
must be done manually by defining each service property under the <provides> 
element, which makes it impossible to ever propagate an unknown configuration 
property.

Finally, though the CM specification does talk about "a Managed Service" and 
mentions the single-argument updated(Dictionary) method, the rest of the text 
in Section 104.4.3 sounds as though it's describing how both ManagedService and 
ManagedServiceFactory should work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to