> From: skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 15:30 -0700, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
>
> > proto_async(int n0, int n1, int m1, int n2, int m2) :
> > async_active(n0), driver(async_active,n1,m1,n2,m2)
> > {
> > // start waiting thread. note that we only have ONE event waiting
> > thread.
> > // that's currently important for clean takedowns, at least for the
> > // kqueue demuxer. see its destructor comments for more info.
>
> As an aside .. this just isn't true. Demuxer waiting stuff is
> only monitoring one kind of event: state changes on sockets.
I've removed the reference to kqueues. It now should be correct, will
checkin when finished with iocp quitter.
> AFAIK even the timer uses a distinct thread. Original Linux
> SDL implementation also used a thread to wait for keyboard
> events.. etc. Be good to clarify some of these comments.
That's for sure. I'll have a bit of a look over it after I finish
with these bugs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
