On 7/22/07, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, perhaps it is a bug, but currently, a _ctor_* fuction > for an abstract type must be defined in the same scope > as the abstract type.
Well, that's probably how you should lay about. I stumbled across this one because I didn't know about the _ctor_* notation and I'd been writing awkwardly named functions to replace them. My first attempt with _ctor_ happened to be in a different scope and I thought I'd found a bug, however my distilled version compiled. All is now clear. I think I asked something similar once about the get_blah functions. Same thing? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
