> From: skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 00:07 +1000, skaller wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 19:23 +1000, skaller wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of changing procedures so they can return values.
> >
> > It's done, as follows:
>
> Here is ackermann's function in the new format:
>
> //C PROC <5925>: ack_mkproc
> void FLX_REGPARM ack_mkproc(
> int x_mkproc, int y_mkproc, int* _5943_mkproc)
> {
> int _mkp_5953;
> start_5557:;
> ifnot(x_mkproc == 0 ==1) goto _5552;
> *_5943_mkproc = y_mkproc + 1 ;
> return;
> _5552:;
> ifnot(y_mkproc == 0 ==1) goto _5553;
> y_mkproc = 1;
> x_mkproc = x_mkproc - 1 ;
> goto start_5557;
> _5553:;
> ack_mkproc(x_mkproc, y_mkproc - 1 , (int*)&_mkp_5953);
> y_mkproc = _mkp_5953;
> x_mkproc = x_mkproc - 1 ;
> goto start_5557;
> }
>
> I have no idea if this is faster or slower than the old version :)
I definitely reads better than the old one.
Did the old one use the machine stack like that?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
