2009/3/31 john skaller <skal...@users.sourceforge.net>

>
> On 31/03/2009, at 2:35 AM, Emmanuel Onzon wrote:
>
>
>> Roughly Felix would benefit from ability to add new productions by
>> "pushing" them onto a grammar stack, and later "forget" these productions.
>>
>> I conceive this as a purely functional operation, not a modification,
>> working just like "scopes" in programming languages (because that's
>> precisely the context in which the feature is needed :)
>>
>> This is exactly how extending the grammar works with dypgen,
>> unless I'm missing something.
>>
>>
> yes but it can't be done without priorities: there's no way to "push"
> a grammar production into a chain otherwise.
>
> Merely adding another case to a non-terminal's RHS production list
> is not enough to add a new operator, since the list is closed off by
> a tail jump to the next precedence.
>
> Having priorities allows this because you can insert one between
> two others, Hmm. Note this required deleting a priority and adding two
> more if they're not transitive .. hmmm ...
>

Adding new priorities is not a problem, but deleting them
is currently not possible (except when going out of scope).
Could you give me an example where you need to delete
a priority to insert a new operator in the grammar ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language

Reply via email to