On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:28 AM, john skaller <skal...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Really? I thought it didn't do that, since migration is expensive in terms > of cache coherency .. that being the idea behind affinity.. did this > change?
I've seen some articles claim that the schedulers in linux 2.5 and 2.6 do a pretty good job keeping tasks on one cpu, but here's how to set the affinity if you want to experiment. http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6799 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-affinity.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
