On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, john skaller
<skal...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> BTW: I think I understand why they're in there: they're not actually used 
> anywhere!
> But they're in there, because Erick was working on being able to do lookup
> on the bound symbol table. The idea was that you could make a bound symbol
> table for a library, discard the unbound symbol table, and then when you're
> using the library in some program, the lookup could check in both the programs
> unbound symbol table then the libraries bound table: this is much faster than
> doing lookup in the unbound symbol table of the library, since things like
> types are already bound (actually the types are cached anyhow so this isn't
> a good example).
>
> However it's not clear what to put in there for synthesised symbols,
> and the inliner makes a LOT of those!

Indeed it was, but I never managed to get any of it working :(

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language

Reply via email to