On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, john skaller <skal...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > BTW: I think I understand why they're in there: they're not actually used > anywhere! > But they're in there, because Erick was working on being able to do lookup > on the bound symbol table. The idea was that you could make a bound symbol > table for a library, discard the unbound symbol table, and then when you're > using the library in some program, the lookup could check in both the programs > unbound symbol table then the libraries bound table: this is much faster than > doing lookup in the unbound symbol table of the library, since things like > types are already bound (actually the types are cached anyhow so this isn't > a good example). > > However it's not clear what to put in there for synthesised symbols, > and the inliner makes a LOT of those!
Indeed it was, but I never managed to get any of it working :( ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
