On 10/04/2012, at 10:12 PM, john skaller wrote:
> Unfortunately it's a no-go.
New theory ..
a + i <- a . j;
RHS uses a.j notation (or, j i). This is sustainable for opaque array types.
It can work for array[] as well.
LHS can be implemented for opaque types. For array object,
we have a &array, so it can work there too.
For a carray, that's a pointer to some value type. The a . j notation
can be defined for that (but will then work on all pointers).
Similarly, a + i not only can be defined .. it probably already is.
--
john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net
http://felix-lang.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
