On 15/12/2013, at 2:33 AM, srean wrote: > > Ok, it makes me a little sad nonetheless. Felix doesn't use loops anyway
The Felix *code generator* doesn't generate "for" loops. There are certainly for loops in the run time libraries though. [The code generator does generate a particular while loop though] > so unless GCC is reconstituting them from control flow, none of the loop > optimizations would (including the non aggressive ones) apply. Well, clang eliminates these constructions, it only uses gotos, SSA blocks are its native internal representation. And you can be sure clang does *some* loop optimisations so it must, in some sense, reconstitute them. -- john skaller skal...@users.sourceforge.net http://felix-lang.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
