On 04/08/2014, at 7:53 PM, Jeffrey Beu wrote: > > Thanks John, your suggestion seemed to work.
Great! Sorry about the hassle. I'm reworking the build system but I had to take a break to sail North out of the winter cold. > I will probably co-develop along side nimrod and see how it goes. Looking at > the Felix syntax gives the impression of many undocumented features that make > it appear better than nimrod. Though I must admit I not really prepared to > dig though BNF grammar and implementation code as a replacement for > documentation. I am also working on documentation. However there are features that are "experimental" that aren't documented. When in doubt just ask on this list (and be prepared for more explanation that you really wanted :) There is actually quite a lot of documentation, but documenting "the whole system" is a daunting task, so if something isn't clear please again: ask here for an explanation, if there's no documentation I might add it. A lot of the library simply requires you to read the code. If it's a binding to C/C++ the specification is derived from that. Regexps, for example, use Google RE2 so some of the details depend on reading the RE2 docs. -- john skaller skal...@users.sourceforge.net http://felix-lang.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
