okay, first word back from the experts is that it probably would NOT be
a good idea to put a cat who might be fighting off the virus in with
positives--if the immune system is busy fighting off the virus to start
with, it doesn't need the added stress..... especially since there are
different strains of the virus--once more, the limits of my knowledge:
i KNOW there are different strains, but i tend to forget about it since
i don't really understand it...
a virology instructor at u of m (ann arbor) has been contacted for more details...
so--that would limit fostering to those people/places who have room to
segregate kitties for the retesting period. OR to homes with healthy,
vaccinated negatives.
which doesn't change the need for foster homes for definite, re-tested
and confirmed, positives who need a safe place to live while placement
efforts go on.
(i know we can't save even all the healthy cats who need homes--am i
being completely unrealistic about even trying to save the FeLVs????
should i just accept that the very limited number of FeLV homes we have
are all that's possible right now, and let this go? i do not feel
objective enough to answer that question for myself....)
--
MaryChristine
AIM / YAHOO: TenHouseCats
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 289856892
- Re: so much for fantasy... TenHouseCats
- Re: so much for fantasy... Nina
- Re: so much for fantasy... TenHouseCats
- RE: so much for fantasy... MacKenzie, Kerry N.
- Re: so much for fantasy... TenHouseCats
- Re: so much for fantasy... Cherie A Gabbert