Well maybe she should have called and then someone would have stopped her before the number got up to 200...If you are a legit organization, like a shelter, there are not too many questions that need to be answerd unless you are dealing with 200 cats in 1 years time. Then there should be questions and maybe just maybe the death toll would be 100 not 200.
"Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Gloria B. Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cherie, that's not realistic. The veterinarians just don't do that kind of
thing, and certainly not for free. So one is stuck trying to figure out
what to do. Up there in the urban areas, even the city may charge, and
then you run the risk of legal problems with such a quantity (if that's
accurate)... so it becomes a difficult issue for the individual dealing
with it.
Gloria
>Cherie A Gabbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>If she would have picked up the phone and called the local animal hospital
>I am sure they would have taken the dead animals...unless she did not want
>to answer questions, and that is just another mark against her.
>
>Tad Burnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>I agree...I would like to know the story behind the 200 dead animals...
>That makes no sense to me..But if she took in a lot of sick FeLV+...
>That is still a huge number to have outside and she has to be sick to
>let that happen..As I say there is a story behind that and I think we need
>to know it before we can pass judgment...
>Tad
Have a purrfect day
Cherie
