RE: fund raising for my case

[MacKenzie, Kerry N.]

Title: Message

Yes, that's very helpful Michelle. Answered my question. Kerry     -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 9:14 AM To: felvtalk@felineleukemia.org Subject: Re: fund raising for my case Tonya,     The only way something like this would go to the federal level, probably, is if every level of a state court upheld the law and it was appealed to the U.S. Supreme court on federal constitutional grounds.  It would be possible to sue a city in federal court to begin with on federal constitutional grounds, but for various reasons legally that would probably not be the way to go-- state court is. And in Hideyo's case, where she is appealing a municpal court decision under a state law that allows such appeals to go to state court, it would be very complicated and not recommended to go to federal court.       As for ALDF, they only have one or two lawyers at this point, in CA, and they are deep into other cases.  The network they have of member attorneys (like me) is simply that, a network.  They apparently do not even refer members of the public to attorneys in their network, because that is not what people sign up for when they sign up as members-- they just sign up to get updates and be part of the organization, not have their info given out to members of the public with particular cases. ALDF was willing to give me two names because I am actually an attorney member, and I called them but one was retired and the other was not working in the same place anymore. The attorney I found for Hideyo is an ALDF member, but for some reason ALDF did not even give me her name and number, I got it from Alley Cat Allies. And I would bet for sure that she is the only ALDF attorney member in Albuquerque-- she does not know of any others.  She did offer to make a few calls for Hideyo for free, but because she is trying to make a living doing exclusively animal law (which is great! and rare!), she does need to charge her clients or she will not be able to make a living and will have to go back to doing another kind of law for pay. And every animal law related client is going to be someone who we would think should get pro bono services-- a rescuer, a shelter, a person with an animal in a bad situation, etc.  If she did them all for free she could not do this work as her main job. Plus she spends a lot of time, on her own without pay, trying to get a TNR ordinance passed in Albuquerque, so she really does need to do paid work the rest of the time. So I totally understand why she can not do it pro bono. I would bet she will not charge Hideyo as much as a run of the mill lawyer would, though-- we will have to see what they work out.       Hope that helps explain the situation,   Michelle    In a message dated 12/23/2005 10:01:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hideyo,   I can't believe ALDF won't find someone to take your case pro bono.  I am a member.  Maybe if all of us wrote ALDF on your behalf they would reconsider?   I will be glad to add to your fund as well in the meantime, but it's going to have to be after the holidays.  I have mail stacked to the ceiling and don't even know how much money I do (or don't, lol) have until I sit down and get my checkbook in order!  But I know I have some money for your cause.   Plus if you could win this case it would help others who live with these ridiculous laws, like where I live.  Our county limit is 8 animals.  I would LOVE to see someone take it to court!  And really, I can't believe no one has done this before (like ALDF) and got it to a federal level.  In my opinion it's unconstitutional!   t   =00 IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE. Any advice expressed above as to tax matters was neither written nor intended by the sender or Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed under U.S. tax law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then (i) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing (by a person other than Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP) of that transaction or matter, and (ii) such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayers particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.