No thoughts on that, but my opinion on the vet is that
he's obviously either done some homework and/or is
learning from FeLV from experience, both of which are
wonderful!  If only all our vets were like this!

:)
Wendy


--- Susan Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Guys, is this true???  Pos Elisa and Neg IFA is
> bad??  What's everyone
> opinion regarding what what Cracker's vet said??
> 
> Thanks!!!
> 
> 
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/26/06 5:17:29 PM >>>
> I forgot to mention something important. My vet had
> told me that when a
> cat  
> is positive on Elissa test and then has a Positive
> IFA that  the two 
> positive 
> results from the two tests is better then having a
> POS Elissa and  a
> NEG 
> IFA.He said when Elissa is POS and IFA is NEG
> sometimes the virus is 
> hiding in 
> bone marrow. He said that he believes that a cat has
> a better chance 
> of 
> throwing off virus if both tests are POS considering
> they arent a
> false/pos.  He said 
> best to recheck in 6 months and see what tests say.
> But he did warn me 
> that 
> just because Crackers is very healthy now DOES NOT
> mean he will always
> be  
> that way and he may keep the virus permantly! But as
> mommies/daddies we
> NEVER  
> give up hope. The one thing he said that made me
> down a little was that
> he  
> suggests  that I keep Crackers my only pet. I am
> aching for a kitten or
> 2  or 3. I 
> miss watching Crackers having a play buddy. He loved
> Pokies. He said 
> after 
> the 2nd testing in March we can discuss that topic.
> I know most of you 
> have 
> multi/ cats POS and NEG. Dr. said if I was too adopt
> another POS Cat or
>  healthy 
> one Crackers now has a risk factor. So right now new
> babies is on the 
> back 
> burner. I just have to keep looking at all your
> great sites and
> Crackers  loves 
> sitting on my lap looking and the Kittys! Then we
> have our other
> babies:)  
> much love and great thoughts to all
> love
> Kayte AND Crackers
> P.S. sorry so long
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
> This e-mail is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, 
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law.  If the 
> reader of this e-mail message is not the intended
> recipient, or the 
> employee or agent responsible for delivery of the
> message to the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution 
> or copying of this communication is prohibited.  If
> you have received 
> this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately
> by telephone at 
> (312) 554-3300 and also indicate the sender's name. 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to