One of the related, inner struggles I have with such cases are, the cruelty charges made to those with "good intentions" (which I do believe existed here) will likely stick, yet every day sick individuals who purposely torture and maim cats and dogs get off very easily even with much evidence. I read one case recently of a man in California who was caught torturing then consuming stray cats, supposedly he was even witnessed skinning one alive (and other horrible acts), and he got a bit of community service, probation and a fine under $500. This happens all the time. Perhaps the discrepancy is solely in evidence, witnesses and the legal process, but it seems to me that hoarders are penalized more stringently than flat out torturers who commit such acts willingly, not because they got in over their heads.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Beth <create_me_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > http://northeastcobb.patch.com/articles/good-mews-assists-aspca-in-rescue-of-600-cats#photo-9221699 > > Don't Litter, Fix Your Critter! www.Furkids.org <http://www.furkids.org/> > > > _______________________________________________ > Felvtalk mailing list > Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org > http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Felvtalk mailing list Felvtalk@felineleukemia.org http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org