Good luck winning this and if you do let me know how!  We brought the same type of accusations against Defenders of Animal Rights, Inc, (aka Adopt A Pet) in Pheonix, Maryland back in the 1990's to no avail.  The state courts didn't care that many of the animals were put down in the wrong manner, sometimes taking as long as 10 -20 minutes to die because they were injected in the wrong place.  The state didn't care that hundreds of animals a month were destroyed, most turned over as strays to this private shelter, who by MD law isn't even allowed to accept strays, often these animals were destroyed on the very day, sometimes hour they were brought in.  Thereby never giving their owners (should they have just gotten away-like the sheep-dog mix wearing the electronic colar) the chance to find them (he was destroyed the very afternoon he had run off).  Many strays were adopted out the same day, sometimes hour, they were brought in or a day ! or two after, without any holding period.  All the cats and kittens were adopted with the claim that they had been cleared for FIV, and FeLV -but they had never even been tested, although worming shots were given.
 
Not to discourage you, but you will find that getting any state to actually enforce its laws that are to protect animals is difficult at best.  "No one really cares" is what we were told, even after presenting affidavit after affidavit.  As for the human euthanasia, we were told as long as the end is death...there wasn't much room, or interest to pursue the matter, (I offer as example the baby rabbit who met its fate in the garage of the shelter, head placed between two concrete blocks and stomped to death).  -YEAH- "Defending the Rights of those who can't speak for themselves" my a**!
 
Please, if you have any luck, let EVERYONE know how you did it!
 
Good luck & God Bless
T

Belinda Sauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone with rescue contacts in this area please be sure they are aware of this --

FRAZIER PARK, CALIF., RESIDENT FILES SUIT AGAINST KERN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTERS, ASKING FOR IMMEDIATE END TO EUTHANASIA UNTIL THE COUNTY COMPLIES WITH THE LAW

For Immediate Release

http://www.shelterwatch.com/

BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA -- October 25, 2004: Today, two of California's most "infamous" animal shelters, described by critics as "death machines," were charged in Kern County Superior Court with flagrant violation of laws concerning the humane treatment of animals.

The charges, brought by a Kern County resident and longtime animal rescue worker, contend the personnel in the Mojave and Bakersfield animal shelters are killing animals instead of allowing them to be adopted.

Additionally, court records indicate, the killings were done using untrained personnel, in violation of existing laws. Therefore, what should be a "humane" euthanasia death may become a lengthy, excruciating torture before death. Small kittens and puppies along with older and ill animals, whose veins are small or frail, became prime victims.

According to Kate Neiswender (Ventura, CA), attorney for Petitioner Patricia Lock, the suit was filed only after repeated requests failed to convince Matt Constantine, head of Kern County's Animal Services Control Division, that the shelters be ordered to abide by existing laws.

"This is a case of on-going abuse and failure to follow state and federal laws at the Animal Shelters in Kern County," Neiswender said. "We don't want them killing animals at will...and that's what these shelters are doing."

"They are killing 50 to 75 animals every day. These figures are the direct result of the shelters refusing to work with rescue groups, keeping stray animals behind locked doors, and refusing to spay and neuter. It's as if they are deliberately making it difficult for people to adopt an animal, or to find their lost animals, or for rescue groups to do their jobs. Most of these animals are killed without even having had a chance at being adopted - or even seen."

The suit is based on two 1998 California laws. The Vincent bill (AB 1856) requires that all animals adopted from a public or private shelter be spayed or neutered prior to release from the shelter. The Hayden Law is a comprehensive strategy for reducing the number of animals euthanized every year. It requires longer holding periods, provision of medical care to sick or injured animals, working with rescue organizations, community outreach and other actions, all designed to increase the number of adoptions, and decrease the number of animals killed. Kern County shelters in Bakersfield and Mojave euthanize between 20,000 and 25,000 animals every year.

"People believe when they take an animal to the shelter, the animal has at least a fighting chance of finding a new home. What they don't know is that the animal comes through the front door with the owner, but is taken immediately out the back door to be killed." Neiswender said.

"And to add to the problem, a recent study showed that 25 percent of purported owners bringing dogs and cats to shelters were, in fact, not the owners, but ex-wives or neighbors out for revenge. That's why the law was changed to make sure there was proof of ownership. That isn't being done at the Mojave and Bakersfield shelters, Neiswender said.

At the same time, Neiswender claims, although "drop bins" have been eliminated at almost all shelters throughout of the state, they still exist in Kern County.

"The drop bins were originally designed for emergencies. But they have been turned into a blood sport. A cat is put into the bin and an aggressive dog thrown in with her. When the bin is opened the next morning there is often a dead cat, or pieces of a cat...yet the drop bin remains."

Additionally, according to the Complaint filed today, personnel at the two shelters are killing animals without regard to a legal waiting period of four days and have "routinely refused to allow public access to impounded animals...keeping cats and kittens...and a majority of the dogs in locked areas away from the public and rescue organizations."

While the law requires Kern County to work cooperatively with rescue organizations, they have refused to do so. "We feel these shelter people, for lack of leadership or lack of conscience, claim they are not allowed to call, for example, the Golden Retriever Rescue when a Golden Retriever puppy is impounded. And, many, many times they have refused to adopt to rescue groups," Neiswender says.

"In good conscience, I don't think we should let this go on."

A website has been set up to collect information from the public on their experiences with the Kern County shelters, it is located here:  http://www.shelterwatch.com/

Permission to cross-post anywhere and everywhere.

--
 Belinda
Happiness is being owned by cats ...

Be-Mi-Kitties ...
http://www.bemikitties.com

Post Adoptable FeLV/FIV/FIP Cats/Kittens
http://adopt.bemikitties.com

FeLV Candle Light Service
http://www.bemikitties.com/cls

Vote For Us
http://www.bemikitties.com/toplist/cgi-bin/topsites.cgi?id=1

-----------

Web Design Porfolio
http://www.bemikitties.com/bmksamples.htm#portfolio
 


Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com

Reply via email to