On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:25:02 +0200 Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:50:04 +0300 > Päivo Simson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Is there a way to disable console output for > > interpolate_nonmatching_mesh? This happens when the point is outside > > the original mesh. The output looks like this: > > ... > > <Point x = -7 y = 17.5 z = 0> > > <Point x = -7 y = 10.5 z = 0> > > <Point x = 7 y = 17.5 z = 0> > > <Point x = -7 y = 3.5 z = 0> > > <Point x = 21 y = 17.5 z = 0> > > ... > > I could not find anywhere in the source code where these messages > > could be disabled. Im using fenicstools-1.3.0 > > This is probably because of > > 384 id = > mesh.bounding_box_tree()->compute_closest_entity(point).first; > 385 cout << "Extrapolating function value at x = " << point > 386 << " (not inside domain)." << endl; > > in dolfin/function/Function.cpp which happens when extrapolating. This > is really annoying and flooding stdout and should be fixed. AFAIK this > can only be muted using > > set_log_active(false); > > before executing some extrapolating code and afterwards reverted by > > set_log_active(true); > > Jan It is little more complicated. There was one more cout in dolfin-1.3.0 379 // If not found, use the closest cell 380 if (id == std::numeric_limits<unsigned int>::max()) 381 { 382 if (allow_extrapolation) 383 { 384 id = mesh.bounding_box_tree()->compute_closest_entity(point).first; 385 cout << "Extrapolating function value at x = " << point 386 << " (not inside domain)." << endl; 387 } 388 else 389 { 390 cout << point << endl; 391 dolfin_error("Function.cpp", 392 "evaluate function at point", 393 "The point is not inside the domain. Consider setting \"allow_extrapolation\" to allow extrapolation"); fenicstools intentionally triggers dolfin_error on line 391 and catches it. So you can - install new DOLFIN 1.4 where interpolate_non_matching is included as LagrangeInterpolator or - tweak the source of your DOLFIN 1.3 or - use set_log_active(false) trick Still, cout in current DOLFIN should be eliminated. What about making it a warning? Jan > > > > > Any help is much appreciated. > > > > Best regards, > > Päivo > > _______________________________________________ > fenics-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support _______________________________________________ fenics-support mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support
