Thanks Jan for your advise. 

I have something working now. 

Corrado


> On 31 Jan 2015, at 13:52, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Corrado, it seems to me that fenics-install.sh is not appropriate for
> what you want to do. Its goal (and hashdist's generally) is to install
> FEniCS stack as a single, embedded, well-defined stack, independently of
> the machine used.
> 
> If you want to customize the dependencies used and take care of them by
> yourself then fenics-install-component.sh or modified version of
> fenics-install-all.sh (you just get rid of invocation of
> fenics-install.sh there and substitute you own method there; Dorsal
> works here as well but nobody maintains it so it requires some
> monkey-patching.)
> 
> Besides this, slepc4py should be added to fenics-install.sh but I think
> that there are some troubles here and Johannes is watching it.
> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:15:54 +0100
> Corrado Maurini <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I was the one helping Claire, so I try give you some more details and
>> I take the opportunity to give some feedback on hashdist install
>> after spending almost two days compiling:
>> 
>> General remarks: 
>> 
>> 1 - hashdist is nice, but I was not able to install with slepc4py
>> only using hashdist. 
>> 
>> 2 - I found http://fenicsproject.org/fenics-install.sh
>> <http://fenicsproject.org/fenics-install.sh> interesting as an
>> example for personalise script, but I do not like the “one-click”
>> install philosophy and I would not recommend it to newcomers,
>> because: (i) if you have any problem during the installation you have
>> no idea bout how to solve (and it is very likely you have a problem,
>> if you do not have a completely clean os) (ii) if you want to change
>> the settings (e.g. add slepc4py) you have no idea about what to do.
>> (iii) you completely loose the control about what it is happening and
>> your system, and it is not evident at all to track what the script is
>> doing. 
>> 
>> 3 - I think that hashdist should be used by adopting/modifying the
>> profile fenics.Darwin.yaml provided in the examples in hashdist (and
>> eventually tuning its setting for your system) and using hashdist
>> with “hit build” being aware of what you are doing. In my opinion
>> this method should be documented on the fenics website. 
>> 
>> 4 - It is not evident to select the best practice to let hashdist
>> interact with your generic package manager (homebrew/macport). In my
>> understanding hashdist is not designed to be a replacement of a
>> generic package manager, but to work on top of it.
>> 
>> My current solution is a mix, maybe not optimal, and not yet
>> definitive:
>> 
>> - As a general practice I try to stick to system compilers (clang)
>> and system python (2.7). A big issue is that very often you do not
>> understand which one of the many python installed in your system you
>> are using.
>> - I use homebrew as generic package manager. I use it to install
>> generic dependencies as cmake, boost, vtk, eigen, openmpi, libxml … I
>> also install gcc with homebrew to have a fortran compiler, but then I
>> use clang to compile c, c++
>> - I install petsc/slepc/petsc4py/slepc4py manually with my own
>> PETSC_DIR and PETSC_ARCH, letting petsc install all the dependencies
>> like parmetis, metis, super_dist, ml, ...
>> - I use hashdist to install only ffc/ufl/instant/…/dolfin stack,
>> eventually with different profiles (e.g., 1.5, development,
>> yournewbranch). To do this you have to modify the  fenics.Darwin.yaml
>> profile to use host packages for whatever it is already installed
>> (boost, vtk, petsc, slepc, slepc4py, hd5)
>> 
>> I hope it may give an idea … but it is not "one-click" if you want to
>> have control on your system … 
>> 
>> Otherwise I think the only “easy” solution is to use binary (and I
>> think that it is important that are provided with all possible
>> dependencies) or a virtual machine with fenics-virtual. 
>> 
>> In particular, I teach a master class using fenics, and I do not even
>> talk about compiling for source to students. I suggest two options:
>> binaries (if they works) or virtual-fenics. And this year 38
>> students, not proficient with programming and os-menagement, were
>> able to use it without my help from macsox/linux/windows … The case
>> of Claire is different, because she need special feature, namely
>> petsc4py (and she is not a master student!). Corrado
>> 
>> Corrado Maurini
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 30 Jan 2015, at 15:45, Claire Lestringant
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I used the command line on FEniCS website : 
>>> curl -s http://fenicsproject.org/fenics-install.sh
>>> <http://fenicsproject.org/fenics-install.sh> | bash
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 30 janv. 2015 à 15:43, Miroslav Kuchta <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> could you please share how you installed FEniCS on Mac? Did you
>>>> use dorsal, hashdist, …? Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Miro
>>>>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 17:59, Claire Lestringant
>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I installed FEniCS from source on my computer (mac OS Yosemite),
>>>>> and I wish to work with slepc4py. What is the best way to install
>>>>> it ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> 
>>>>> C. Lestringant
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> fenics-support mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fenics-support mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
fenics-support mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support

Reply via email to