> On 11 Feb 2015, at 20:15 , Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Terje Kvernes <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just tested this and everything seems to have built just fine, thanks! >> Are there any reasons for using SWIG 3.0.2 over 2.0.8 for FEniCS? > > SWIG 2.0.8 should be fine as long as you don't use Python 3. For > Python 3 you will need SWIG 3.0.3 or later, I think.
Ah, right. Well, tonight I’ve managed to automate the process from starting the build (via fenics-install.sh) to creating and enabling the environment module from the build, so I can create a python 3 option easily enough if anyone requests it. I’ve also got development builds with a custom build working. The change to hashstack and the subsequent creation of fenics-install.sh (with the recent changes as well) have made installs extremely streamlined for me. At this point RHEL7 is so smooth I might have to turn to cloning the configuration to my Mac to find new problems. Great job! -- Terje Kvernes Driftsansvarlig Matematisk Institutt Universitetet i Oslo _______________________________________________ fenics-support mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support
