On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:07:38PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 27 May 2013 23:05, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:00:16PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >> On 27 May 2013 22:47, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I've just pushed a new typedef 'mesh_index' for unsigned int, similar
> >> > to the existing 'la_index'. I suggest we use it in place of unsigned
> >> > int wherever we now use unsigned int in place of std::size_t to save
> >> > space for local entity indices.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Could you motivate the addition? la_index has a clear motivation -
> >> compatibility with linear algebra backends.
> >
> > So that whenever we use 'unsigned int', it is for a clear purpose -
> > either to save space or for compatibility with the index type used by
> > the mesh library. It is otherwise likely that it is just using
> > unsigned int out of old habit (as I'm prone to). It also has the
> > advantage that we can easily change the definition of the type in the
> > future if we should need it.
> >
>
> For me a typedef has the opposite effect. It obscures the type. I find
> it easy to choose between std::size_t and unsigned int because the
> type is obvious. I would prefer to not introduce an unnecessary type.

I find that 'mesh_index' conveys a purpose. Now we use size_t as our
default unsigned integer type, except when for some reason we really
want something else. There are currently two such examples: for
compatibility with the linear algebra backends or for compatibility
with the mesh library. It feels natural (to me) to then have la_index
and mesh_index. When we then see 'mesh_index' in the code, it signals
that whoever wrote that code had a purpose and was not writing
unsigned int out of old habit.

It's a small change to revert (only introduced so far in the geometry
library). I won't insist on it but I'd like to hear some more comments
first.

--
Anders
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to