On 28 May 2013 10:42, Kristian Ølgaard <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 28 May 2013 10:31, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> organize the apps on Bitbucket but I suspect anyone who tries it will
>>
> have a hard time tracking down all the app developers and moving them
>> over to Bitbucket.
>>
>
> We don't necessarily have to move all developers if we keep the links to
> individual app pages on http://fenicsproject.org/applications/.
>

Indeed.


> As development of FEniCS Plasticity is discontinued on Launchpad, I would
> be happy to stick it under some common fenics-apps repo/project on
> Bitbucket if possible while maintaining admin control of the Plasticity
> repository.
>

How about an experiment. I'll create fenics-apps and fork FEniCS-Plasticity
into it, and give you admin rights to the fork. Then you can have a look to
see if it's good enough. We'll just delete it afterwards if it isn't.

-j.

On 28 May 2013 10:42, Kristian Ølgaard <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 28 May 2013 10:31, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We tried at some point in the past to set up guidelines and rules for
>> apps but it was not very successful. App developers want complete
>> control of their code, coding practices etc which I think is fine.
>>
>
> As long as the app is using parts of FEniCS of course... what about
> license requirements?
>
>
>> So my suggestion would be to keep it as loose as possible: We list the
>> apps with an image, a short text and a link on the FEniCS web page -
>> that makes the apps "officially sanctioned". Other than that, the apps
>> can put their code wherever they want. I'd welcome any effort to
>> organize the apps on Bitbucket but I suspect anyone who tries it will
>> have a hard time tracking down all the app developers and moving them
>> over to Bitbucket.
>>
>
> We don't necessarily have to move all developers if we keep the links to
> individual app pages on http://fenicsproject.org/applications/.
> As development of FEniCS Plasticity is discontinued on Launchpad, I would
> be happy to stick it under some common fenics-apps repo/project on
> Bitbucket if possible while maintaining admin control of the Plasticity
> repository.
>
> Kristian
>
>
>> --
>> Anders
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:07:12AM +0200, Joachim Berdal Haga wrote:
>> >    I'll kick off: The value of fenics-apps in general is in the
>> increased
>> >    visibility of these projects, and in return in "adding value" to
>> fenics
>> >    by increasing its scope. But the value of any specific mechanism
>> >    whereby the apps are grouped or blessed - on [1]fenicsproject.org,
>> on
>> >    launchpad or bitbucket, in the book - is more fluid. In my opinion,
>> >    each of these has a potential audience and are worthwhile.
>> >    -j.
>> >
>> >    On 28 May 2013 09:55, Garth N. Wells <[2][email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >    On 28 May 2013 08:35, Joachim Berdal Haga <[3][email protected]> wrote:
>> >    > I think with the limited interest and disagreements about
>> procedure,
>> >    I'll
>> >    > shelve this idea for now.
>> >    >
>> >
>> >      I wouldn't say disagreements - it's a different system so the pros
>> >      and
>> >      cons needed to be assessed to make an informed decision. It's also
>> >      an
>> >      opportunity to reflect on what with the 'apps' has worked well, and
>> >      what perhaps hasn't worked well. I think it's a discussion still
>> >      worth
>> >      having.
>> >      Garth
>> >
>> >    >
>> >    >
>> >    > On 23 May 2013 13:46, Joachim Berdal Haga <[4][email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >    >>
>> >    >> Why, it seems like a perfectly sensible policy to me. The projects
>> >    listed
>> >    >> on that page are under the fenics applications umbrella, and hence
>> >    permitted
>> >    >> to have repos in the fenics-apps team. The projects that do not
>> want
>> >    to be
>> >    >> hosted within fenics-apps are not going to be forced into it, of
>> >    course!
>> >    >>
>> >    >> -j.
>> >    >>
>> >    >>
>> >    >> On 23 May 2013 13:20, Garth N. Wells <[5][email protected]> wrote:
>> >    >>>
>> >    >>> On 23 May 2013 12:07, Joachim Berdal Haga <[6][email protected]>
>> >    wrote:
>> >    >>> > Yes. I suggest that whatever is listed on
>> >    >>> > [7]http://fenicsproject.org/applications/ is sanctioned. Which
>> >    just moves
>> >    >>> > the
>> >    >>> > problem elsewhere, but that problem already exists.
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>>
>> >    >>> That's not a policy.
>> >    >>>
>> >    >>> Not all those projects will want to be hosted within a
>> fenics-apps
>> >    >>> team. What will their status be?
>> >    >>>
>> >    >>> Garth
>> >    >>>
>> >    >>> > Does anybody else have an opinion on whether 'fenics-apps'
>> should
>> >    exist
>> >    >>> > as a
>> >    >>> > team? In particular, are any of the other projects listed at
>> >    >>> > [8]fenicsproject.org/applications/ interested?
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>> > -j.
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>> > On 23 May 2013 12:30, Garth N. Wells <[9][email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >> On 23 May 2013 11:10, Joachim Berdal Haga <[10][email protected]
>> >
>> >    wrote:
>> >    >>> >> > True, but I don't see it as significant. The repo can
>> contain
>> >    >>> >> > multiple
>> >    >>> >> > development/release/topic branches, and if this isn't
>> >    sufficient
>> >    >>> >> > then
>> >    >>> >> > multiple repos can be created by the team administrators.
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >> Just something to weigh up. The key question is whether having
>> >    'team'
>> >    >>> >> is better than individual project teams. For example, maybe
>> the
>> >    CBC
>> >    >>> >> collection is better as it's own team with a collection of
>> >    >>> >> projects/repos rather than as a bunch of repos in a apps team.
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >> If there is one apps team and it's 'sanctioned', there needs
>> to
>> >    be a
>> >    >>> >> policy on how a project qualifies, and under what
>> circumstances
>> >    it
>> >    >>> >> should be removed.
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >> Garth
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >>
>> >    >>> >> > (Later, after looking into team access administration:) I
>> see
>> >    now
>> >    >>> >> > that
>> >    >>> >> > repo
>> >    >>> >> > creation is a separate acl, so it is possible to give
>> creation
>> >    >>> >> > rights to
>> >    >>> >> > projects without giving full administrative access.
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >> > -j
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >> > On 23 May 2013 11:31, Garth N. Wells <[11][email protected]>
>> >    wrote:
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >> On 20 May 2013 21:33, Anders Logg <[12][email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >    >>> >> >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:13:44PM +0200, Joachim Berdal
>> >    Haga
>> >    >>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    I'm about to move cbc.block (which is listed as a
>> >    fenics
>> >    >>> >> >> >> application)
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    from launchpad to bitbucket. I think it would be nice
>> >    if the
>> >    >>> >> >> >> repository
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    could be in a "fenics-apps" team - like the
>> >    "fenics-group"
>> >    >>> >> >> >> project
>> >    >>> >> >> >> on
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    launchpad. It makes the fenics applications more
>> >    >>> >> >> >> discoverable,
>> >    >>> >> >> >> and
>> >    >>> >> >> >> the
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    urls more descriptive.
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    I can of course create this team myself since the
>> name
>> >    isn't
>> >    >>> >> >> >> taken,
>> >    >>> >> >> >> but
>> >    >>> >> >> >>    I'd prefer it to be decided by somebody more in the
>> >    loop than
>> >    >>> >> >> >> I...
>> >    >>> >> >> >
>> >    >>> >> >> > I think having a fenics-apps team
>> >    >>> >> >> > ([13]https://bitbucket.org/fenics-apps)
>> >    >>> >> >> > would be a good idea. And same as last time, I'd prefer
>> if
>> >    >>> >> >> > someone
>> >    >>> >> >> > else took charge of it. Previously, Andy and Kristian did
>> >    this on
>> >    >>> >> >> > Launchpad.
>> >    >>> >> >> >
>> >    >>> >> >> > So if you volunteer, just go ahead and create the team,
>> but
>> >    lets
>> >    >>> >> >> > wait
>> >    >>> >> >> > to get some more comments, especially from Andy and
>> >    Kristian.
>> >    >>> >> >> >
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >> There are some drawbacks to this. An 'apps' project won't
>> >    have full
>> >    >>> >> >> control, e.g. will not be able to create multiple repos. On
>> >    >>> >> >> Launchpad,
>> >    >>> >> >> fenics-apps was an umbrella rather than  a team.
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >> Garth
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >>
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >> >
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>> >
>> >    >>
>> >    >>
>> >    >
>> >
>> > Referenser
>> >
>> >    1. http://fenicsproject.org/
>> >    2. mailto:[email protected]
>> >    3. mailto:[email protected]
>> >    4. mailto:[email protected]
>> >    5. mailto:[email protected]
>> >    6. mailto:[email protected]
>> >    7. http://fenicsproject.org/applications/
>> >    8. http://fenicsproject.org/applications/
>> >    9. mailto:[email protected]
>> >   10. mailto:[email protected]
>> >   11. mailto:[email protected]
>> >   12. mailto:[email protected]
>> >   13. https://bitbucket.org/fenics-apps
>> >   14. mailto:[email protected]
>> >   15. http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> _______________________________________________
>> fenics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to