On 4 September 2013 10:46, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > It is just a report, but I guess it answers most of your questions. > > https://t.co/1dPJZYZRUa > > Garth and Chris are the obvious goto here. >
Chris and I are working on some more extensive performance testing to answer these sorts of queries. Garth > Johan > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Ham <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I'm writing responses to reviewers for the FEniCS on manifolds paper which >> Marie, Colin, Andrew and I submitted to GMD. One of the reviewers is giving >> us grief about not including parallel scaling results. The reason we haven't >> done so is that we were just modifying FFC, which is basically orthogonal to >> the parallel performance problem, so what I would like to be able to do is >> point them to the existing Dolfin parallel performance and claim we haven't >> done anything which would change that. Unfortunately, I haven't so far >> located a published result which shows Dolfin's parallel performance. The >> FEniCS book documents the existence of shared and distributed memory >> parallel in chapter 10, but doesn't give performance results. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Many thanks, >> >> David >> >> -- >> Dr David Ham >> Department of Computing >> Imperial College London >> >> http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/david.ham >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fenics mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> > > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
