The right fix is to throw away the next branch.

Next should never be merged into master.

Martin

søndag 8. september 2013 skrev Garth N. Wells følgende:

> The FFC master and next branches are a bit out of shape because some
> changesets have been pushed directly to next (they should have been
> made in  feature branch). To get things back on track, the simplest
> fix is to merge next into master. This should be ok because there are
> basically no changes in next that aren't ready for master. Any
> objections to merging next into master?
>
> Garth
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:;>
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to