Hi, Thanks for commenting! I think the decision is to move the parts of DOLFIN using CGAL to a separate library which will implement our wrappers for mesh generation and build against CGAL. That way DOLFIN itself can be built faster without needing to link to CGAL (the templates are costly).
Benjamin Kehlet will be the one responsible for implementing our meshing component. He can give an update on what the current plan is and also provide feedback on some issues we have had with the meshing in CGAL. -- Anders On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:00:41PM +0100, Andreas Fabri wrote: > Hello, > > I only accidentally found the thread concerning the CGAL mesh generator > http://fenicsproject.org/pipermail/fenics/2013-October/000672.html > > As we work on CGAL, and as you provide valuable user feedback, > we might try to help with some reported issues, > if you think that it makes sense to keep the CGAL mesh > generator in fenics. > > > Best regards, > > Andreas > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
