I support switching to whatever is new and better, but don't have any experience with either.
-- Anders On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:31:21AM +0100, Johan Hake wrote: > I have some experience of both frameworks and think they are much superior to > what we have and I therefore support a future transition. pytest also let you > annotate your tests facilitating running only part of your test suit which > could be handy. Porting the python tests to pytest, should be straightforward, > but it is of course a tedious job. > > Johan > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been discussing with Martin the merits of moving to modern unit > testing frameworks. We both have some experience of googletest (https:// > code.google.com/p/googletest/) and Martin has experience with PyTest > (http: > //pytest.org/). Some motivations for considering a switch are (a) simpler > code for C++ and Python tests (particularly for C++); and (b) scope to > speed-up by running tests in parallel. Both googletest and PyTest are on > the buildbots and are used by uflacs. > > I don't think switching is pressing, but it would be helpful to hear if > there are any strong views either way. > > Garth > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
