+1

Martin


On 28 March 2014 15:00, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:

> Following some discussions on getting non-affine maps working with FEniCS,
> I'd like to propose adding the function
>
>     ufc::finite_element::tabulate_dof_coordinates(double* coordinates);
>
> This function will tabulate the dof coordinates on the reference element.
> The purpose is to allow us to match the coordinates of 'higher order nodes'
> that come from a mesh generator (for example) to the UFC dofs. Coordinate
> matching is necessary because UFC does not specify anything as to how dofs
> are ordered locally for a cell.
>
> Related to this, it would make sense to move/change the function
>
>     ufc::dofmap::tabulate_coordinates(double** dof_coordinates, const
> double* vertex_coordinates) const = 0;
>
> to the ufc::finite_element class:
>
>     ufc::finite_element::tabulate_coordinates(double* dof_coordinates,
> const double* vertex_coordinates) const = 0;
>
> and to remove the function
>
>     std::size_t ufc::dofmap::geometric_dimension() const = 0;
>
> This would make a ufc::dofmap purely topological, and would be consistent
> with the proposed addition of ufc::finite_element::tabulate_dof_coordinates.
>
> Garth
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to