On 26/05/14 16:32, Garth N. Wells wrote: > Are there any strong opinions on keeping or removing the Trilinos backend from > DOLFIN? I ask now because there is a maintenance burden in having both (I'm
Every time I've tried the Trilinos backend, it's been slower, so I've never had much need for it. I'd be happy for it to be removed. In particular, I don't think Trilinos nicely supports Schur complement preconditioners (with all of the related nesting and composition) and wrapping both would be a major pain. Patrick _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
