If you find a uflacs commit compatible with 1.4.0 I don't mind marking it. Just know that if it exists, it's by happy coincidence and I won't take bug reports. The version I've kept compatible with dev probably has serious regressions w.r.t. the 1.3 version.
Martin On 3 June 2014 14:57, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 14:51:46 +0200 > Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There will be no 1.4 compatible version of uflacs. > > I don't get it. Shortly before 1.4 release, uflacs-dev was > somewhat working with the rest. So why not to mark come commit by > uflacs-1.4.0 tag? It helps for some automated build configurations on > clusters where one defines VER=1.4.0 and type make. > > > > > If you get ufl/ffc/dolfin/uflacs next branches now, > > you get the newest version of uflacs. There are > > new features there compared to 1.3, but possibly > > some regressions and performance regressions as well. > > The reason for the regressions is a significant > > rewrite of some parts and addition of some new > > algorithms, where the focus has been on getting > > things functional and the final optimization is not done yet. > > Can one pick some uflacs commit compatible with 1.4.0? Why can't it be > marked as uflacs-1.4.0? > > Jan > > > > > Martin > > > > > > On 3 June 2014 14:28, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There is still missing uflacs-1.4.0 tag. > > > > > > Jan > > > > >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
