Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> writes: > However the current definition of jump is well defined, documented in > several publications, and with user codes depending on its behaviour, > so changing it is not a good idea.
Unless I'm completely missing the thread, the current definition treats a contravariant vector as covariant (a covector). This is definitely not what was intended in the Unified DG paper, they just implicitly stated the definition for covectors.
pgpQLVB220x2c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
